pages: PlanningBoard/2007-09-24.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2007-09-24 | 3 | 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: None. 8-A Development Agreement DA89-1 -- Harbor Bay Business Park Association, Harbor Bay Isle Associates and Harbor Bay Entities -- Bay Farm Island (Primarily Harbor Bay Isle). A request for a Periodic Review of Development Agreement DA89-01, for the period through April 4, 2007, as required under Zoning Ordinance Section 30-95.1. Member Ezzy Ashcraft moved to adopt the Planning Board Resolution to accept the Periodic Review of Development Agreement DA89-01, for the period through April 4, 2007, as required under Zoning Ordinance Section 30-95.1. Member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 6. Absent: 1 (Cunningham). The motion passed. 9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 9-B. Alameda Landing Waterfront Promenade, Master Landscape Plan and Development Agreement Amendment, Project Applicant: Catellus Development Group, an affiliate of Palmtree Acquisitions Corporation. The applicant requests a Waterfront Development Plan amendment, a Master Landscape Plan amendment, and a Development Agreement amendment to revise the design of the proposed waterfront promenade and open space proposed as part of the Alameda Landing Project. The site is located along the western end of the former FISC Site (Tract 7884) within the M-X Mixed Use Planned Development Zoning District. (AT) Mr. Thomas presented the staff report. and recommended approval of this item. Mr. Aidan Berry, applicant, introduced the project team and concept. Ms. Altschuler, SMWM, displayed a PowerPoint presentation and described the details of the approach and solutions of the project. She described the landscape plan in detail, as well as shoreline access and planting. Vice President Kohlstrand noted that in pulling back the promenade, one of the office buildings was being cut off. She inquired whether the square footage of office was being reduced, or whether stories would be added to the office building. Mr. Thomas stated that the entitlement for office use was 400,000 square feet per the Master Plan, and added that the changes in the promenade would not change the amount of square footage of allowed office use. The old plan anticipated that the second warehouse would be retained; under the new plan, it would not be retained, and a new office building would be included, with half the footprint of the old building. The additional square footage would be gained by going up. He clarified that the approval of the development plan for the promenade was an approval of the open space concept, but Page 3 of 18 | PlanningBoard/2007-09-24.pdf |