pages: PlanningBoard/2007-09-24.pdf, 17
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2007-09-24 | 17 | Mr. Thomas noted that staff was concerned about the driveway and the access to Kathy Wagner's property, and that the condition should be modified to state that there should be mutual agreement on all the cross easements, indemnification, liabilities and the standard legal language, to be worked out to the mutual consent of the parties. Mr. Thomas noted that Obaid Khan from the Public Works Department was in attendance, and would like to insert a reference to the MDIP. Obaid Khan, Public Works Department, wished to address Condition 2 on page 3, which related to substantially similar requirements and inconsistencies. He noted that Public Works recommended including a reference to the Master Demolition, Infrastructure, Grading and Phasing Plan (MDIP). This plan would define the infrastructure grading and infrastructure plan. Mr. Barry noted that they would probably go to Council on the sidewalk and north/south access. He believed the DDA already had the provisions for the protection of the MDIP; it contained a dispute resolution and opportunities for modification. He noted that if that condition was added, they would probably take that one to Council as well. He noted that they had come a long way on the design, and should be able to accommodate the Board's design comments, as well as bringing the elevations of the public streets back as well. Mr. Thomas reviewed the proposed changes: 1. Reference to the MDIP, per Public Works; 2. Approve the alternative site plan (Page L-1-01) 3. The final design elevations for Mitchell Mosely, Stargell and Mariner Square Loop will return to the Planning Board for final approval once they have been worked out with the applicants; 4. Building A height and variation in the height will be included in the design returned to the Planning Board; 5. Strike the phrase in Condition 3 "provided that the property owner may elect to close the driveway"; 6. Condition 4 will be modified with respect to the driveway and mutually agreeable insurance and cross-easements. Mr. Thomas added that the vegetation on all screens would be double-checked. Member McNamara seconded the motion, with the following voice vote - 1. Noes - 1 (Lynch). Absent: 2 (Cunningham, Mariani). The motion passed. 10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board member Ezzy Ashcraft wanted to ensure that the complete packets, including drawings, were being delivered to the main library and the two branch libraries. Page 17 of 18 | PlanningBoard/2007-09-24.pdf |