pages: PlanningBoard/2007-03-26.pdf, 21
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2007-03-26 | 21 | Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the property identification at the top of page 3 should be placed at the beginning of the paragraph at the bottom of page 2. Vice President Cook noted that with respect to 10.3.f, the language should be changed to .allow for the development of public facilities such as fire stations and public and private schools. Board member Cunningham noted that 10.6.b should be changed to read, "eliminate reduce-the need for sound walls." Vice President Cook suggested that 10.6.d should be change to read, "provide docking areas to encourage waterborne transportation." She noted that there were very few opportunities to dock a boat at a restaurant such as Chevy's. Vice President Cook noted that at the end of the sentence on 10.6.e., the following language should be added: design the street to protect the shoreline experience for the public Vice President Cook suggested that in 10.6.1 the following language be added: "along the shoreline where feasible" to try to get the separation between bicyclists and auto traffic. Board member Cunningham noted that with respect to 10.6.u, whether "behind" meant facing the street or the waterfront. He believed it should be harmonized with the waterfront, and integrated with landscaping and public access. Mr. Thomas believed the second half of the sentence worked in that the placement should be carefully considered. Vice President Cook suggested that on 10.6.b, the following language be added to the end of the sentence: or key views to the shoreline." Board member Kohlstrand suggested that on 10.6.b, it be clarified that it referred to parked cars, not cars traveling along Clement. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the Marina Village Parkway did a nice job of screening the cars. Vice President Cook noted that with respect to the first 10.8.b, she suggested adding the following language at the end of the sentence: .architectural style that respects Alameda's unique history and maritime character.' Board member Cunningham suggested that with respect to the second 10.8.b, relative to stepping down of buildings to approach the waterfront, include the following language: "heights to generally step down" to allow other things to occur. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft suggested that with respect to 10.8.e., it should read, "New development shall should be designed and new streets shall should be engineered to reduce sound impacts and eliminate the need for sound walls." Planning Board Minutes Page 21 March 26, 2007 | PlanningBoard/2007-03-26.pdf |