pages: PlanningBoard/2007-01-08.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2007-01-08 | 2 | Vice President Cook noted that page 9, paragraph 3, should be changed to read, "Vice President Cook expressed concern that this approach would weaken the City's leverage with the developer. She asked whether the Planning Board could look at the overall site plan as it was allowed to examined in 2003, including the intentions stated at that time. Vice President Cook noted that page 9, paragraph 6, should be changed to read, "In response to Member Ezzy Ashcraft's request for the specific examples, Vice President Cook replied that she was concerned about the status of they were: Vice President Cook noted that page 10, paragraph 5, should be changed to read, "She also expressed her concern that the Planning Board had approved a PDA for this site with conditions, and that a at least one major condition had not been met. She inquired what the Board's options were at this point. She inquired how the developer could proceed in this way by first building under the PDA, and-but then-returning on a building-by-building basis for approval outside of the PDA; she would appreciate a response from staff that addressed her concerns." Vice President Cook noted that page 11, paragraph 7, should be changed to read, "Vice President Cook was disappointed that a waterfront site would have only "peekaboo" views of the Bay from a second floor deck." Vice President Cook noted that page 13, paragraph 1, should be changed to read, "Vice President Cook complimented the applicant on their design details for the part of the project approved and built pursuant to the 2003 PDA work, especially the fine details. She believed to date the center was well-done and greatly improved, but and added that it could be much better from a waterfront planning perspective." Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 2, paragraph 5, should be changed to read, "AYES - 4 (Mariani, Cunningham McNamara-absent) Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that on page 6, she believed the Board had been addressed by the owner of the Zephyr company. Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 8, paragraph 4, should be changed to read, "He believed it was a moot point, because once the Planned Development Amendment application was acted upon, everyone including the applicant acknowledged that everything was back on the table." Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 10, paragraph 1, should be changed to read, "Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that she was passionate about the issue of the sidewalk, and disclosed that she did a walkthrough of the property with Harsch, and also with Field Paoli, and representatives from the Alameda Transportation Commission, Bike Alameda and Pedestrian Friendly Alameda." Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 12, paragraph 3, should be changed to read, "She liked the cut-throughs, and did not want to see the issues swept under the rug, and inquired whether the Board could request a date certain for completion of incomplete items once the questions have been Planning Board Minutes Page 2 January 8, 2007 | PlanningBoard/2007-01-08.pdf |