pages: PlanningBoard/2006-11-13.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2006-11-13 | 7 | 7-B. V06-0007 (Variance) and DR06-0090 (Major Design Review) - 1331 Sherman Street - Applicant: Casey Deshong (DB). The applicant requests a Major Design Review approval for approximately a 198-square foot, single-story addition to the single-family dwelling and a Variance from the 20-foot rear yard setback and 40-percent lot coverage requirements pursuant to AMC Subsection 30-4.1(d)(7) and 30-4.1(d)(3). The site is located within a R-1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. M/S Cook/Cunningham and unanimous to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-06-46 to approve a Major Design Review for approximately a 198-square foot, single-story addition to the single-family dwelling and a Variance from the 20-foot rear yard setback and 40-percent lot coverage requirements pursuant to AMC Subsection 30-4.1 (d)(7) and 30-4.1(d)(3) AYES - 5 (Mariani, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Following the vote, President Lynch received a speaker slip regarding this item, and invited a motion to withdraw the approval of Item 7-B. Ms. Mooney suggested a motion to rescind, and to open the public hearing. M/S Cunningham/Kohlstrand to rescind the approval of Item 7-B, and to open the public hearing. AYES - 5 (Mariani, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 The public hearing was opened. Mr. David Maxie, 1330 Bay Street, noted that the owner of the property behind him, with a St. Charles Street address, recently requested a variance in order to add a bedroom and a bathroom. He noted that all the garages along the line backing up between St. Charles and Bay Street were probably all within six inches of the property line. He noted that the garages would be the only view from the back of the property. He noted that the house adjacent to the property was approximately four feet from the property line. He believed the owner should have his variance because the view was not different from what was already there. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. M/S Cook/Cunningham and unanimous to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-06-46 to approve a Major Design Review for approximately a 198-square foot, single-story addition to the single-family dwelling and a Variance from the 20-foot rear yard setback and 40-percent lot coverage requirements pursuant to AMC Subsection 30-4.1(d)(7) and 30-4.1(d)(3) AYES - 5 (Mariani, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 8-B. Proposed expansion and redevelopment of the Alameda Towne Centre (DG). The focus of this workshop will be on site and building design. Information will be provided concerning applications submitted by Harsch Investment Properties. These include Planned Development Amendments PDA05-0004, PDA06-0002 and Major Design Review DR05- Planning Board Minutes Page 7 November 13, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-11-13.pdf |