pages: PlanningBoard/2006-11-13.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2006-11-13 | 15 | be specifically stated. He believed there must be a balance struck in that case, which may be a reduction in parking or square footage. He noted that it was the developer's business to understand the economics of a project, and suggested that as the developer discusses the plan for the site, that was the point where the Board and the community ask for clarification. He understood that a balance must be struck. Member Kohlstrand believed the presentation about the pedestrian enhancements were very positive, and she was most concerned that the intersection at Whitehall Place and Franciscan Way would be addressed. She recalled the comment made during the public hearing regarding the appropriateness of the Craftsman style, and noted that she liked the articulation presented in the design, although it was a huge structure. She was unsure about the design solution, but believed the developer should take that design comment to heart in deciding what the best design solution would be. She recalled the comments about the color schemes, and inquired whether it would be red or another color scheme more in keeping with Alameda. Member Kohlstrand expressed concern with respect to the Transportation Commission's recommendation of establishing three lanes with a bidirectional turn lane on Park and Shoreline. She was concerned that this mitigation measure implied a loss of parking and treatment along the street that would make it even harder for pedestrians to cross those streets. She realized that would be clarified with the environmental document, and would like more emphasis on alternative modes of transportation. She believed that turning lanes should be more focused at the area where they would be needed, rather than a continuous treatment of the whole street. Member Ezzy Ashcraft reflected on the public comments expressing concern about crime and vandalism, and wondering why Alamedans flocked to out-of-town Targets if there was a problem in that area. She noted that Alamedans were not known for leaving the Island to an unsafe destination. Vice President Cook concurred with Member Ezzy Ashcraft's comment, and believed that Target appealed to a wide range of shoppers. She believed it would be a benefit to have a Target in the City. President Lynch believed that the discussions within the development team should begin with improvements in the infrastructure. A discussion of circulation in the internal roads ensued. Mr. Kyte noted that they would consider the many comments and return with an in-depth session. He invited the public to see their large model as a prelude to a study session. He would like to resolve the issues and work towards the remaining key issues such as the size of the Target. No action was taken. President Lynch noted that 10 speaker slips for Item 8-C had been received. President Lynch noted that Member Ezzy Ashcraft temporarily left Chambers, and added that Item 8-C would be heard before Item 8-A. Planning Board Minutes Page 15 November 13, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-11-13.pdf |