pages: PlanningBoard/2006-10-23.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2006-10-23 | 8 | that using Fortmann would be a more natural movement. With respect to the design of the buildings, particularly the three-story buildings, Mr. Buckley inquired whether they could be redesigned so the third floor could be better integrated to the rest of the building. He noted that the Guide to Residential Design specifically discouraged popups as additions to existing historic buildings; he believed these buildings were attempting to reflect the historic architectural character of Alameda, and that this design principle might apply to these buildings. He wished to call attention to the detailing of these buildings, and while looking on the City website, could not find the Planning Board resolution for a permanent Planned Development in the design review. He would like more information on window selection, trim, porch elements, which he believed were very important. He knew that Warmington Homes generally handled these elements very well. Mr. Thomas noted that the packet in the staff report contained the resolution approving the Planned Development and design review. The Master Plan also contained some details, and there were conditions of approval requiring that prior to the issuance of a building permit, there would be a final landscape plan and final architectural detail to be submitted to the Planning Director for final approval. He noted that the Planning Board may add specifics to those conditions. Member Kohlstrand wished to compliment the project sponsor for their enhancements to the project, and believed it had improved greatly. She shared Mr. Buckley's concerns, and suggested that signage be included showing marina access was via Fortmann. She noted that 12 spaces along Hibbard were assigned to BCDC. Mr. Thomas noted that there were 12 guest spaces on one side of the triangular parks. However, within the large public parking area for the marina, BCDC wanted the City to assign 10 spaces for public users of the waterfront so boat users don't park there. Mr. Jason Neary, CBG Engineers, addressed the parking issue, and noted that under the permit, BCDC identified 10 parking spaces to be available for BCDC's use. He noted that those 10 spots would be allocated somewhere along the marina parking area for BCDC use. In response to an inquiry by Member Kohlstrand regarding concerns about the borrowed easement and shadowing, Mr. Day replied that they had not had any negative feedback about the borrowed easement. He noted that there was a lot of light in the third story during the day, and noted that the third story can only be 500 square feet by code. He added that would result in shadowing of a very small percentage of the house next door, and added that the homeowners like the private sideyard for barbeques and other social activities. Member Kohlstrand noted the condition recommending that all the sidewalks be a minimum of five feet wide, and inquired whether the sidewalk along Grand could be wider. Mr. Thomas believed that would be an acceptable condition for Grand, and described several landscaping possibilities near the sidewalks and alleys. Planning Board Minutes Page 8 October 23, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-10-23.pdf |