pages: PlanningBoard/2006-07-10.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2006-07-10 | 4 | time. She would like to find a way to discuss Measure A. She believed that Alameda Point presented a good opportunity to weave itself into the grid of the rest of the City. As a Victorian owner, she supports Measure A wholeheartedly, but believed that matters were different on Alameda Point. She would like to have a thorough discussion of the pros and cons of Measure A, as well as the meaning of density. Member Ezzy Ashcraft Kohlstrand noted that the City Charter stated that the Planning Board may shall have power to investigate and recommend plans for future development, location of public buildings and works, and subdivision of land. She inquired when this dialogue could take place, and did not believe that any topic germane to the City's current and future development should be off- limits. Ms. Mooney noted that for public comments regarded off-agenda topics, the Board may not have discussion beyond brief responses by Board members and staff, references to further information, and/or direction to staff to agendize the topic. Member Kohlstrand noted that the Catellus item would address Measure A, and that August 11 was the date to place an item on the November ballot. Member Lynch was neither an opponent nor proponent of Measure A, but was troubled by the sense that the question may not be raised. He believed that in order for the City to look forward, a discussion of such issues must be held. President Cunningham requested that a discussion of Measure A be agendized. Member Lynch stated that he would prefer that the discussion focus on the merits of the current City Charter as it related to the planning process and possible buildout of Alameda Point, rather than various infill issues that may cloud the discussion. President Cunningham believed that a special meeting may be warranted to hear the public's input. Vice President Cook was concerned about the timing of this discussion, and would like to hear the pros and cons of this item being placed on the ballot sooner rather than later. Board member McNamara expressed the need for a forum for a healthy discussion on Measure A since it has not happened yet. She was not aware of any planned events by the City Council to provide an opportunity for an open discussion on Measure A, but she felt there should be one. She noted this would give the community an opportunity to voice their opinions on Measure A. Mr. Thomas stated that he would work with the President of the Board to identify options for Board consideration at the next regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting. Planning Board Minutes Page 4 July 10, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-10.pdf |