pages: PlanningBoard/2006-05-08.pdf, 11
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2006-05-08 | 11 | Member McNamara noted that the shading report was difficult to read and understand. Ms. Pudell described the details of the shading study, and noted that second generation photocopies were difficult to read. Member Kohlstrand suggested postponing a decision on this item until the original shading report could be brought to the Board. She noted that information from the neighbors had been received before the meeting, and noted that she would like more time to review it. Ms. Pudell noted that the shading study was received only a few days before the packets were issued. M/S Lynch/Kohlstrand to continue this item to the Planning Board meeting of May 22, 2006, in order for the Board to have more time to review the information. AYES - 6 (Mariani absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 11 May 8, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-05-08.pdf |