pages: PlanningBoard/2006-04-24.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2006-04-24 | 3 | 7. CONSENT CALENDAR: 7-A. TM06-0001- - Barry Vial - 1951 Harbor Bay Parkway (DG). The applicant requests approval of Tentative Parcel Map 8980, allowing the conveyance of up to 13 separate commercial spaces located within two buildings to separate owners. The project site is zoned C-M-PD Commercial Manufacturing, Planned Development Zoning District. Ms. Kohlstrand noted that the Board requested consideration for removing parking spaces in front of the building along Harbor Bay Parkway. She noticed that there were still parking spaces there, and requested clarification of the changes and how they would affect the subdivision of the parcels. Mr. Garrison advised that there were originally 11 parking spaces in front, which had been reduced to seven spaces, with the four extra spaces moved to the side and to the rear. Additional landscaping had been installed in front. The parking allocation would be addressed through the CC&Rs. Ms. Kohlstrand was uncomfortable with any parking in front of this development, which would be reflected in her vote. In response to an inquiry by President Cunningham on whether Item 7-A should be placed on the Regular Agenda because of the lengthy discussion, Ms. Woodbury replied that it should be pulled in the affirmative. Ms. Kohlstrand stated she would like the parking to be eliminated from the front of the site. Ms. Woodbury replied that staff looked at the circulation issues with other departments, which was the reason the parking could not be eliminated. The area must be maintained for emergency circulation and circulation for the site as a whole. M/S Kohlstrand/Mariani and unanimous to move Item 7-A from the Consent Calendar to the Regular Agenda. AYES - 4 (Ezzy Ashcraft, Cook and McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 The public hearing was opened. Mr. Barry Vial, applicant, noted that the project contained individual units for sale to small business owners, and the project as approved called for a middle unit with reasonably close parking to those facilities. He did not believe it was a good amenity for an owner to walk up to 100 feet to their own business. He believed that the loss of those additional seven spaces would hurt his chances to sell the units. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. Ms. Kohlstrand noted that she would set aside her objections to the parking, since City Council had Planning Board Minutes Page 3 April 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-04-24.pdf |