pages: PlanningBoard/2005-05-23.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2005-05-23 | 14 | 9. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 10. BOARD COMMUNICATION: a. Oral Status Report regarding the Alameda Point Advisory Committee APAC (Vice President Cook). Vice President Cook advised that she had requested regular updates on the APAC's work (see Item 11-A). b. Oral Status Report regarding Northern Waterfront Specific Plan (Vice President Cook). Vice President Cook advised that there was nothing new to report since the last meeting. c. Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member Piziali). Board Member Piziali advised that there was nothing new to report since the last meeting. d. Oral Status Report regarding the Golf Course Committee (Board Member Mariani). Board Member Mariani advised that Mr. Thomas had made a presentation, which she would defer until the next meeting. The Chinatown group was very pleased with the planning so far, resulting from the Alameda Point proposed development. 11. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: a. Staff update on status of Planning for Alameda Point. Mr. Andrew Thomas advised that he had distributed a flier for the sixth and final workshop regarding the preliminary development concept. The final draft of the preliminary development concept and transportation program would be presented at the June 8 community workshop, and the written documents would be presented at that time. The land use plans and the associated development principles would be presented, as would the transportation program and all its phases, and the historic preservation program. An infrastructure plan that supported the preliminary development concept would be presented, as well as other documents. Staff would take community comment on June 8, and would get a sense from the community in terms of work to date, and what would need further work. Those comments would be brought to the ARRA Board on July 14, 2005. Mr. Lynch expressed concern about the type of partners sought by the City as build out approaches. He inquired whether the agreement structure was such that the Master Developer reserves the right to move forward with the development, whether they can request an extension, and what the triggers in the agreement were. Mr. Thomas recalled the background of the project, and noted that a Conditional Planning Board Minutes Page 14 May 23, 2005 | PlanningBoard/2005-05-23.pdf |