pages: PlanningBoard/2005-05-09.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2005-05-09 | 5 | In response to an inquiry by Vice President Cook, Ms. Ott confirmed that there would not be any painting on the exterior of the historic theater. Mr. Piziali wished to emphasize that this was a separate project on a separate parcel from the historic theater, and was not a historic addition. Ms. Mariani noted that she did not have a problem with the canopies or the extension any more, and believed it would all blend in together. She would like to see more vertical elements. She believed it was a good project and would like to move forward. Ms. McNamara asked what elements resulting from the subcommittee meetings were included in the design. President Cunningham noted that there had been an effort to erode the strong horizontal and vertical lines at the corner. The articulation of the corner was also addressed by adding a dome. He commended the project architect on his work given the budget. The 20-inch setback had been discussed in the subcommittee, which added more shadow; without the setback, the sheer wall would have detracted from the project. Vice President Cook noted that she was not comfortable with the additional vertical elements. She agreed with Ms. Krase's comments about the color scheme. She agreed that the columns were busy. She noted that the original concept of the project included retail space on the ground floor to enliven the street. Although she did not favor the ball on top, she appreciated the improvements in the corner elements. She liked the increase in size of the Oak Street sidewalk. She requested that the architects do whatever they can to step the new building down with respect to the old theater to soften the connection. President Cunningham expressed concern about the dark glazing on the upper level, and understood the concerns about the heat gain. He encouraged the use of low-e double-pane glass instead. Mr. Connors noted that they chose the bronze glass to avoid the reflection inherent in the low-e glass. Mr. Piziali suggested the use of dark anodized aluminum glass. A discussion of the dome element ensued. M/S McNamara/Lynch and unanimous to accept the preliminary design for the Cineplex generally at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue on the Video Maniac site. The following modifications would be included: 1. The dome would be eliminated; 2. The aluminum storefront would have dark anodized frames glazing; 3. The angles on the right-hand side of the building would be softened; 4. The original exterior color would be researched by staff, Planning Board Minutes Page 5 May 9, 2005 | PlanningBoard/2005-05-09.pdf |