pages: PlanningBoard/2005-04-11.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2005-04-11 | 9 | Mr. Piziali noted that the type of window material should be specified in the plans. Mr. Brighton replied that people were able to install any kind of window consistent with the style of architecture, but aluminum windows were prohibited under the Design Guidelines. In response to an inquiry by Mr. Lynch whether a garage existed on the property, Mr. Chau stated that it was extended with permits and approvals. He did not know whether the garage was being used for parking. The owner stated that it was used for parking and minor storage. He recommended that the garage be removed. Mr. Lynch believed the addition square footage being sought should incorporate the parking for the residents to the extent possible. He strongly suggested that the applicants discuss this issue with staff, incorporate those discussions into a document to submit to the Planning Board for approval or denial. Mr. Piziali believed the driveway should be narrowed in the front, and did not believe a single curb cut would be legal. He requested further information on the driveway. "Mr. Piziali wished to clarify that the pavement of the driveway was very wide, and that they were parking two cars there. He wanted to see the driveway brought back to Code with respect to the project.' Vice President Cook commended staff on the work it did under the current conditions, and would like it reflected in the plans that it would be a single-family home. She believed the interior staircase should be decidedly open and not easy to close up. M/S Piziali/Lynch to adopt Planning Board Resolution No.PB-05-13 to uphold the appeal and deny the Major Design Review and remand it to staff. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 9 April 11, , 2005 | PlanningBoard/2005-04-11.pdf |