pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-10-04.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2021-10-04 | 7 | is more familiar with the term quasi-adjudicatory; it is difficult for her to interpret someone else's statement about another statement that was made. Commissioner Reid stated that she would like clarification on what Mr. Foreman was asking in his correspondence; if the OGC is quasi-adjudicatory, what are the ramifications of the recent null and void proposal and what are the necessary steps to rectify the situation; inquired whether it is true that the OGC is quasi-adjudicatory. Chair Tilos stated the term came up when the City Council and City Attorney's office said the Commission could not use null and void; therefore, the OGC does fall under the label of quasi-adjudicatory. The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated another staff member from her office made the presentation to the City Council on June 1st; she cannot intuit exactly what Mr. Foreman is meaning in his comments; she would be happy to respond at a later time with more depth. Commissioner Reid stated Mr. Foreman's comments regarding the statements made at the June 1st City Council meeting that the OGC is quasi-judicial should be addressed; inquired how the City Attorney's office interprets that statement now. Chair Tilos stated null and void has been answered; the Commission cannot use it; inquired whether Commissioner Reid's is intending to bring the null and void issue back for discussion. Commissioner Reid stated that she just asked the question and would like an answer from the Chief Assistant City Attorney on whether the City Attorney's office considers the OGC to be quasi-adjudicatory. Chair Tilos stated the Chief Assistant City Attorney already stated she would provide a response in depth at a later time. Commissioner Reid stated her question was mentioned in the correspondence from Mr. Foreman, which she assumes everyone has had a change to read. Chair Tilos stated the correspondence was sent two hours before the meeting and not everyone has read it. The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated that she scanned Mr. Foreman's correspondence; at this point, there is no reason to say anything different than what Mr. Le may have said on June 1st; she does not recall the exact comments and is still not entirely clear what Commissioner Reid is asking her to do related to this particular agenda item. Commissioner Chen stated what she understood is that the Commission has an adjudicatory function, which means the Commission decides whether or not there is Meeting of the Open Government Commission October 4, 2021 7 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-10-04.pdf |