pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-03-01.pdf, 13
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2021-03-01 | 13 | to all Committee members. Commissioner Shabazz raised a point of order proposing that, based on time and the timing of receipt of Commissioner LoPilato's proposal for item 3-D, that Commissioner LoPilato's proposal regarding the null and void remedy could be addressed at a later date. Commissioner LoPilato said yes, stated that she anticipated that; stated the long-range solution, while it can be packaged with Item 3-D's discussion regarding replacement of the null and void remedy, was an addition to other topics being discussed, so she is okay with re-agendizing it or handling it at a different meeting. *** Chair Tilos called a recess at 9:23 p.m. and reconvened at 9:26 p.m. *** 3-C. Hearing on Sunshine Ordinance Complaint Filed February 2, 2021 Commissioner Shabazz recused himself since he was on the Jackson Park Renaoming Committee and left the meeting. The Chief Assistant City Attorney clarified that Commissioner Shabazz's recusal is based on a common law conflict of interest. Commissioner Reid stated that she will also recuse herself based on the common law conflict of interest and left the meeting. Complainant Paul Foreman gave a brief presentation. In response to Commissioner LoPilato's inquiry regarding the discussion structure, Chair Tilos stated outside counsel will present next, followed by Commissioner questions and public comment. James Harrison, Olson Remcho, gave a brief presentation. Mr. Foreman stated there are no issues that he needs to rebut. Commissioner LoPilato requested clarification on the delineation between Mr. Harrison's role and the Chief Assistant City Attorney's role tonight. The Chief Assistant City Attorney responded that Mr. Harrison has been appointed as Special Counsel and is representing the interests of the City and the Alameda Recreation and Parks Department (ARPD); her role, as it would be in all meetings, is an advisory role in a legal capacity when questions come up from the OGC; she is not here in an advocacy role this evening; the two advocates are Mr. Foreman, on behalf of himself, and Mr. Harrison, on behalf of the City. Commissioner LoPilato inquired what are the long-range impacts of a Commission Meeting of the Open Government Commission March 1, 2021 13 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-03-01.pdf |