pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-02-01.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2021-02-01 | 6 | Chair Tilos suggested approving the report as is, with a motion for the voluntary suspended complaint be agendized for the next meeting to check the status with the City Attorney office. Vice Chair Shabazz stated a complaint dated May 12, 2020 was for APD Arrest Information; Request 20-40 dated April 15, 2020 was for APD Arrest Information; inquired whether the request was the PRA that lead to the "voluntary suspended" complaint, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Vice Chair Shabazz moved approval of deferring the approval of the report to the next meeting in order to have the City Attorney provide information about the specific instance and to provide any additional context regarding the withdrawn cases as consistent with previous annual reports. In response to Chair Tilos' inquiry, Vice Chair Shabazz re-stated his motion: to defer the acceptance of the annual report with the direction to the City Attorney's office to provide additional context and factual information regarding the "voluntary suspended" case, and, as consistent with previous annual reports, provide any additional context about the withdrawn complaints. Commissioner Chen seconded the motion. In response to Chair Tilos' inquiry, the City Clerk stated there is no specific deadline; the annual report has typically been presented at the Commission's first meeting of the year in February. Vice Chair Shabazz stated he really likes the table and does not want to mandate the format, but asks that the information be accurate. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Commissioners Chen: Aye; LoPilato: Aye; Reid: Aye; Shabazz: Aye; Chair Tilos: Aye. Ayes: 5. In response to Chair Tilos' inquiry, the City Clerk stated the Commission can provide a specific date to hear the matter; the first Monday of every month is now reserved in case the Commission has business; this issue can be considered business and does not have to wait until the specific established date of February or October; any direction the Commission provides will be welcome. Vice Chair Shabazz stated the Commission could schedule the meeting around the timeliness of the City Attorney's office. Commissioner Chen stated if there is a specific pattern of requests that are asked repeatedly, the Commission should anticipate that there will be more questions about more controversial items; items should be clustered together instead of listed by when Meeting of the Open Government Commission February 2, 2021 6 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2021-02-01.pdf |