pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2020-11-16.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2020-11-16 | 7 | meeting. The Assistant City Attorney stated the proposal that was recommended by the Commission is not based on minutes, it is based on a motion from the Commission on the Foreman proposal which is clearly outlined in redline form; if the Commission is moving in the direction of a subcommittee, there should be some concrete direction to that subcommittee vis-à-vis the motion that is made by the Commission concerning the Foreman proposal; he is not sure if the Commission still supports the Foreman proposal as modified by the Commission or is the charge to create something completely new; that ought to be part of the motion as well. Chair Schwartz stated he hears what the Assistant City Attorney is saying but it was not unclear that the idea of the subcommittee is to write a proposal that is consistent with what the Commission recommended at the June; identifying the subcommittee members can be done as part of the motion or after Commissioners agree there should be a subcommittee. The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated the charge of the subcommittee is sufficiently clear and the motion should proceed to see if there is support for a subcommittee, decide who will be on it, and go from there. Meeting of the Open Government Commission November 17, 2020 7 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2020-11-16.pdf |