pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2018-11-14.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2018-11-14 | 8 | a longer delay; nothing may change in the end; there could have been a two week delay instead of another first reading and second reading; it is important to do the right thing. The Assistant City Attorney for the Commission stated there was not a time savings as a practical matter; the issue would have been delayed and would have to be re-noticed anyway in the event of the Commission sustaining the complaint. Commissioner Dieter stated the City moving forward even though a complaint was filed looks bad to the public. The Assistant City Attorney for the Commission stated just because a complaint is filed does not mean the decision made at the October 16th meeting was not in order; the opinion did not changed by November 7th. the Commission could have reached a different conclusion; there was not a compelling reason to change the opinion at the November 7th meeting. Chair Little stated the 267 pages of information was confusing; assumptions cannot be made about the decision; comparing what was originally proposed to the eventual outcome of adding the two businesses has a greater weight; she supports the motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice votes - 5. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Dieter stated that she has enjoyed being on the Commission; sitting at the dais is harder than it looks; commends the people who volunteer to sit on the Commission. The Assistant City Attorney for the Commission noted that he will draft a written decision for the Commission to review and edit so a final version can be completed. Meeting of the Open Government Commission November 14, 2018 8 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2018-11-14.pdf |