pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2016-02-01.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2016-02-01 | 4 | Commissioner Dieter stated that she is open to scratching the entire thing and starting over; she tried to rewrite the provision; the language already addresses receiving information relative to the subject matter at hand. The Assistant City Attorney inquired whether the two suggestions could be combined; stated language could state: in order to ensure that all communications to policy board members presented in a public meeting are shared with the public, communicating electronically with others during public meetings is prohibited when pertaining to the business thereof. Commissioner Dieter and Acting Chair Foreman stated said language is fine. Acting Chair Foreman stated the Commission agrees on the language except he still thinks separate language is needed for quasi-judicial proceedings. Commissioner Dieter stated that she does not think that the general public will know what quasi-judicial means. Acting Chair Foreman stated that he is not concerned about the general public not knowing; the term can be explained; the important thing is the City has to let Councilmembers know that they cannot refer to anything that is not in public view at a quasi-judicial hearing. Commissioner Dieter stated she has no problem if someone wants to look up a word. The Assistant City Attorney stated a conditional use permit would be a good example; if somebody applies to sell liquor at a gas station, a conditional use permit would be needed and would come before the Planning Board; if the use is denied, the applicant would have to appeal the matter to the City Council. Acting Chair Foreman stated the applicant has no idea what the Councilmember is checking; the applicant has the right to know everything being considered in a quasi- judicial proceeding. Commissioner Dieter stated the problem lies with communicating to outside people which is the intent behind the provision; anyone can be at home and look up anything so nothing would be hidden from the public; the main issue is not having people communicate with others. Commissioner Tuazon stated that he feels strongly about it; members need to give 100% of their attention; outside communication should be prohibited; noted that he does not have a cell phone or laptop. Commissioner Dieter inquired whether Commissioner Tuazon would have a problem with a Councilmember looking something up on the Internet while at the dais to help in making a decision or become more informed. Meeting of the Open Government Commission February 2, 2015 4 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2016-02-01.pdf |