pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2016-02-01.pdf, 10
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2016-02-01 | 10 | Commissioner Dieter inquired about an issue on the last page of the Sunshine Ordinance, which is not on the agenda, regarding providing training for City employees and officials. The City Clerk responded training is recorded and available. Commissioner Tauzon inquired whether every employee has to go through the training, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. 3-C. Adopt the Annual Public Report Acting Chair Foreman stated the Annual Public Report is posted on the City's website; the report addresses alleged violations brought to the Commission's attention during the previous calendar year; inquired what Commissioners think about the wording. Commissioner Dieter responded the wording is fine; suggested adding reference to Sunshine Ordinance Section 2-93.6. Acting Chair Foreman inquired whether the Commission concurred. Commissioner Tauzon inquired whether a report would need to be filed if there is nothing to report, to which Commissioner Dieter responded in the affirmative. Acting Chair Foreman stated the public wants to know whether or not complaints have been filed. The Assistant City Attorney stated that he wanted to ensure the item is responsive to what Commissioner Dieter is looking for. 3-D. Informational Report Concerning Disclosure of Documents that have been Determined to be Public After Previously Determined as Unavailable to the Public Commissioner Dieter stated two relevant sections deal with City Attorney reports: Sections 2-91.8 and 2-91.12E inquired whether a report would be presented to Council on the Consent Calendar as a public report. The Assistant City Attorney responded the report, which makes reference to a list of various litigation, claims etc., goes to Council twice a year. Commissioner Dieter stated Section 2-91.8 addresses making a determination about whether documents can be disclosed; inquired whether the matter would also go to Council on the Consent Calendar. The Assistant City Attorney responded that he does not know; stated he would bring the matter to the City Attorney's attention. Meeting of the Open Government Commission February 2, 2015 10 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2016-02-01.pdf |