pages: OpenGovernmentCommission/2015-02-02.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpenGovernmentCommission | 2015-02-02 | 4 | it goes to the City Manager's Office, and, if by chance a title is legislative, it goes through only the City Attorney's office and it does not get changed; if by chance, a legislative title is unclear, then a clarifying sentence will be added so that the public will understand the agenda meeting." The City Clerk inquired which set of minutes Commissioner Dieter is addressing; noted that she is having trouble finding it [the section being revised]. Chair Aguilar inquired what page. Commissioner Dieter responded page 2; stated it says Item 3-C Discussion and Comment on City Council Titles. The City Clerk stated the minutes being addressed are the October 7, 2013 set. Commissioner Dieter concurred; stated trying to decipher the minutes is very confusing; stated that she is still on the same set [October 7, 2013]; stated [the minutes state:] "The Assistant City Attorney summarized a section of the Sunshine Ordinance" but it does not say what the [Assistant] City Attorney said, so the Commission should add: "stated that a meaningful description of the item should be included in plain English;" that way someone does not have to look at the video to find out what the [Assistant] City Attorney said; on the next page, there was a public speaker; it is a little unclear in these minutes that it was a public speaker; it is underlined; she [the public speaker] actually said: "that she felt the lawyer catch phrases, such as relating thereto and with respect thereto, are not needed; they should not be used;" considering there was only one speaker, the Commission might as well get that [comment] right; that [comment] was by Jane Sullwold; on the next page at the top, it says: "Commissioner Aguilar pointed out that non-legislative agenda items are already required, having a caption on non- legislative items would be redundant; it is the legislative titles that have less flexibility;" the [Assistant] City Attorney actually said that ["it is the legislative titles that have less flexibility"], not Commissioner Aguilar; that those are her suggested changes for the October 7, 2013 meeting. Commissioner Bonta and Vice Chair Foreman noted the [October 7, 2013] minutes were already approved. Commissioner Dieter stated that was a mistake. Commissioner Tuazon stated [the minutes should be approved] as correct. Chair Aguilar stated the minutes continue to be approved as corrected. Vice Chair Foreman inquired whether Commissioner Dieter has something for the next meeting [October 6, 2014], to which Commissioner Dieter responded in the affirmative. Meeting of the Open Government Commission February 2, 2015 4 | OpenGovernmentCommission/2015-02-02.pdf |