pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-09-05.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2019-09-05 | 5 | Chair Saxby said the mitigation measures are his focus. He said he appreciates the effort to preserve buildings 15, 17 and 18. He said the proposal for Building 16 is entirely appropriate. He said he would like to see a study of keeping the grade at one or more sides of Building 19. He wondered if the sliding doors should only be used where the original entrances are and that the new entrances on the north and east elevations should be something different. He said he is okay with the raw metal color. He asked what is proposed for all the large roof vents on Building 19. Mr. Fry said the plan is that the vents would stay. Chair Saxby said removing the doors on Building 27 is a difficult issue. He suggested that anything that could be left that indicates the former presence of a door would be a good thing. He said he strongly favors the one story gatehouse. He said the historic buildings do a good job of framing the entrance and that the tower would take something away from the view of Building 19. He said he would like to see the roof monitor restored and water table removed on buildings 15, 17 and 18. Board Members all expressed support for the one story gateway approach. Chair Saxby said that any efforts that can be made to preserve buildings 5, 13, 25 and 26 would go a long way towards preserving important parts of the marina's history. He said we should hold onto the possibility of moving buildings for wharf and seawall work and then moving them back into place. Board Member Jones expressed a desire to reuse materials in a larger fashion than just making benches out of them. Staff Member Tai asked if the Board would be amenable to having the study of the grading on the south and west sides of Building 19 be brought back to staff for decision and shared with the Board as an off agenda report. He said a similar approach could be taken for reviewing the applicant's salvage plans. Chair Saxby said that he would like to add a similar procedure for reporting back on the possibility of moving and replacing the buildings along the waterfront. Staff Member Tai summarized the Board's positions based on the discussion: Building 16 rehab improvements are satisfactory; Building 19 would study the west and south elevations and not have sliding doors on the north and east elevations. Chair Saxby said he supported the idea of not using the sliding doors on the north and east sides in order to differentiate from the original entrances. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7 September 5, 2019 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-09-05.pdf |