pages: CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf, 7
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CivilServiceBoard | 2018-01-03 | 7 | City of Alameda Page 7 Civil Service Board Minutes Regular Meeting January 3, 2018 Director Bronstein believe this section applies to positions that have similar qualifications such as a Utility Accountant at AMP and an Accountant with the Finance Department. One person can possibly move from one position to another without going through a recruitment. The language overall was suggested to be reviewed for clarification. Article IV Section 1 - Vice President Malloy would like to see the term "Position Classification Plan" defined in the document. Article V Section 3 - Vice President Malloy would like to change "salary range" in the second sentence to "wage range" or something similar since everyone is not paid on a salary. She also wanted clarification on the second sentence on the usage of "classification". Article VI Section 1 - Vice President Malloy noticed in the second paragraph that references applications being signed by the applicant which is not applicable anymore. There also needs to be an update on language on when an application is rejected. Vice President Malloy asked if applicants are given notices of rejection. HR Director Bronstein confirmed applicants will receive a notice letting them know they are not selected. Article VI Section 3 - Vice President Malloy asked if it is at the discretion of the HR Director if applications are received after the time limit as described in the second sentence. Assistant City Attorney Cohen added for due process purposes there should be parameters established. HR Director Bronstein added that if one applicant is allowed to amend their application then we allow all to amend in similar circumstances. Article VI Section 4 - Vice President Malloy suggested updating the language for the examination components. Article VI Section 5 - Vice President Malloy wanted clarification for the term "City employees" and whether that means part-time, full-time, or Civil Service employee. It was agreed to update the language and to define "promotional examination" used in this section. Article VI Section 7 - Vice President Malloy suggested to update the language since results of examinations are not "posted" anymore. Article VII Section 6 - Vice President Malloy suggested adding that if you accept the job your name will be removed off the eligible list if that is in fact the practice. Article VIII Section 3 - Vice President Malloy asked if it may be beneficial to refer to the probationary term as the number of hours worked verses months to help account for those who are absent for a period of time. HR Director Bronstein responded that is something to think about as there are overtime hours to consider as well. Assistant City Attorney Cohen added that there would need to be a cross reference against the | CivilServiceBoard/2018-01-03.pdf |