pages: CivilServiceBoard/2017-10-18.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CivilServiceBoard | 2017-10-18 | 6 | City of Alameda Page 6 Civil Service Board Minutes Regular Meeting October 18, 2017 RETIREMENTS DATE DEPARTMENT JOB CLASSIFICATION 6/24/17 Recreation & Parks Park Maintenance Worker (x2) 6/29/17 AMP Utility Info. Sys. Billing Technician 6/30/17 Public Works Construction Inspector 7/22/17 AMP Assistant General Manager - Energy Resources Planning 7/29/17 Police Police Officer 8/10/17 AMP Utility Energy Analyst SEPARATIONS DATE DEPARTMENT JOB CLASSIFICATION 6/08/17 City Attorney Assistant City Attorney II 6/08/17 Public Works Maintenance Worker II 6/15/17 Finance Accountant II 6/21/17 AMP Executive Assistant - AMP 6/26/17 Fire Firefighter 6/27/17 Fire Firefighter 6/28/17 Fire Firefighter 8/03/17 Finance Senior Account Clerk 8/17/17 Public Works Maintenance Worker I 5-B. Informational Report, June 20, 2017, Regarding the Designation of Eligible List - Utility Information Systems Billing Specialist, 2017-13 for Utility Information Systems Billing Technician vacancy, AP.7311.001 5-C. Informational Report, June 27, 2017, Regarding the Designation of Eligible List - Utility Project Manager, 2017-07 for Electrical Distribution Technician vacancy, AP.7250.001 5-D. Informational Report, July 19,, 2017, Regarding the Designation of Eligible List - Public Works Maintenance Foreperson 2016-65 for Maintenance Worker II vacancies. Under section 5-D Member Nolan was impressed that someone was found from the Public Works Maintenance Foreperson eligible list to fill the Maintenance Worker Il vacancies due to the change in salary. Senior HR Analyst Young noted that two (2) candidates were hired from that eligible list but not sure if the candidates accepted a higher or lower salary compared to their current employer. Member Nolan asked if there are any positions in between the PW Maintenance Foreperson and the Maintenance Worker II. Senor HR Analyst Young answered there is not. Member Nolan expressed concern that Maintenance Worker I employees may not have had the opportunity to take the promotional exam but Senior HR Analyst Young said they did take this into consideration and noted that recent vacancies were at the Maintenance Worker I level. Member Nolan asked how many positions are in each classification (MWI, MWII and Maintenance Foreperson). Senior HR Analyst Young made an educated guess of about four (4) employees in | CivilServiceBoard/2017-10-18.pdf |