pages: CivilServiceBoard/2012-08-28.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CivilServiceBoard | 2012-08-28 | 9 | things Mr. Riddle stated that maybe someone should make a motion to grant Mr. Wong's appeal and then grant the other two candidates appeal. His understanding is that if there is not a motion to grant any of the three appeals, the effect of that is to deny the appeal. President Peeler asked based on the City saying that the top three were chosen and Mr. Wong is now in the top three can the Board move that he be appointed to the position. City Attorney Kern stated that what is before the Board is whether or not the processes were fair, not who should get the job. The Board is deciding if the process was fair. It is not the Board's decision on who should get the job. Member McHugh moved that the Board grant the request of the Appellants, not for all of the reasons given, but as to what was brought out in Ms. Kramer's investigation; there was a need to rush, mistakes were made, lack of deciding what the rating criteria would be in advance, and announcing the job posting. All are things that normally do not happen. For those reasons the test should be redone. Batchelor seconded. Motion passed 4-1. President Peeler stated that the test will be redone. 4. ADJOURNMENT: 6:50 p.m. Holly Brock-Cohn Human Resources Director & Executive Secretary to the Civil Service Board Page -9- G:Personnel\CSB\All Minutes/2012 Minutes/2012-08-28 Special CSB Minutes-Draft | CivilServiceBoard/2012-08-28.pdf |