pages: CivilServiceBoard/2012-08-28.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CivilServiceBoard | 2012-08-28 | 6 | San about the minimum requirements stated in the bulletin for the Recreation Services Specialist recruitment and explained that it should clearly state what the minimum requirements are and whether it is only with a 4-year college degree from a university, or no degree with years of experience. The bulletin should clearly state what the requirements are and be specific. Mr. Peterson also stated that Dale Lillard has fired people in the past and only hired people as he chooses. President Peeler asked the Board if they would accept or deny the investigator's finding. Vice President Horikoshi and Members McHugh and Batchelor voted to accept the investigator's findings. Member Malloy stated she'd like to further discuss some finite specific areas with the investigator about some issues raised in the report. Member Malloy asked Ms. Kramer if at any point in the investigation had she checked the scores and if at any time she realized that Ms. Kassebaum had not provided the score to one of the applicants in the areas that clearly address responses within the supplemental questionnaire. Ms. Kramer replied that she did not check the scores and took the responses provided as being accurate. Member Malloy asked Ms. Kramer whether or not she thought the selection process was fair in light of a scorer excluding scores in entire categories. Ms, Kramer replied that the process was fair due to that there was no intent and likely just an oversight and/or mathematical error. Member Malloy stated that the investigation clearly speaks for itself. President Peeler asked the Board for a motion. Member McHugh made a motion to accept the report prepared by Karen Kramer, Esq. Motion was seconded by Vice President Horikoshi. Motion passed by 5-0 vote. 2. The Request of Claimants to Vacate the Results of the Recreation Services Specialist Recruitment. President Peeler addressed the other issue at hand, whether or not the scoring would put someone else into position to get the job over the current position. She addressed the Board on their opinion how to entertain that request. Member Malloy stated she wanted to ask Mr. Riddle, outside counsel for the Board, as to what the Board's role is and how they should continue and whether or not to order another examination process solely based on the results of the current investigation. Or, should they bring up a review of new items that came to light. Ms. Malloy asked if the Board needs to determine and make a decision as to whether or not the scores are accurate. Mr. Riddle stated that the City staff should provide their statements on the matter. President Peeler asked members of the City staff if they had received copies of the documentation provided by the Appellants today. City staff stated they had not. Ms. Peeler Page -6- G:Personnel\CSB\All Minutes/2012 Minutes/2012-08-28 Special CSB Minutes-Draft | CivilServiceBoard/2012-08-28.pdf |