pages: CivilServiceBoard/2012-08-28.pdf, 1
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CivilServiceBoard | 2012-08-28 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CIVIL SERVICE BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY - - AUGUST 28, 2012 - - 5:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER: 5:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Avonnet Peeler, Vice President Peter Horikoshi, Members Dean Batchelor, Linda McHugh, Marguerite Malloy, Executive Secretary Holly Brock-Cohn and Randy Riddle (outside counsel for the Board). Staff: City Attorney Janet Kern, Assistant City Attorney II Stephanie Sierra, Senior Management Analysts Jill Kovacs and Chris Low, and HR Administrative Technician Sharlene Jackson. Appellants: Dave Gossman, Business Union Representative for Operating Engineers Local 3 for Alameda City Employee Association (ACEA) Trini Blumkin, former Alameda Recreation & Park Department (ARPD) Recreation Program Coordinator Marcia Tsang, former ARPD Recreation Program Coordinator Andy Wong, former ARPD Recreation Program Coordinator Investigator: Karen Kramer, Esq., Kramer-Weise Business Management Consultants 3. AGENDA ITEM: A. A Special Meeting has been called for the Civil Service Board Members to Discuss, Consider, and Act on the Following: 1. Results of the Personnel Investigation - City of Alameda Recreation Services Specialist Recruitment dated August 13, 2012 conducted by Karen Kramer, Esq. President Peeler stated that Ms. Karen Kramer, Esq. will be given ten- minutes to present her findings of the investigation and then Board members will have an opportunity to ask questions. Then the Appellant's will have ten-minutes to speak and the public with be able to make comments. Comments from the public will be allowed three minutes per speaker. President Peeler invited Ms. Kramer to present her report to the Board. Ms. Kramer stated that she had been asked to conduct the fact-finding investigation for the Recreation Services Specialist Recruitment and she had concluded her investigation on August 13, 2012. The scope of the investigation was two-fold: 1) Involved the allegations of possible | CivilServiceBoard/2012-08-28.pdf |