pages: CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf, 11
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2022-02-01 | 11 | system will be used to follow up on investigative leads; he will not tolerate staff using the technology to make people feel uncomfortable. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted staff changes; inquired whether a policy can guarantee how the system would and would not be used. The Police Chief responded policies should be created and exist no matter who is in place; stated clear policies will be created to reference how the technology can and will be used; the policy creation process includes getting all stakeholders involved. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City is looking at Vigilant Solutions as a vendor. The Police Chief responded in the negative; stated the current mobile ALPRs are provided by Vigilant Solutions; however, the contract has not been renewed. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired who will be able to access deleted data and whether the data will be accessible. The Police Chief responded the data will not be accessible and is purged; stated various vendors have a digital print of the data; if the matter moves forward, staff will ensure information is gone and inaccessible once purged. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for speed cameras; stated the State of California needs to pass legislation which will allow use. Councilmember Daysog stated the Police Chief has expressed concern about Vigilant Solutions; requested clarification of the vendor selection process; inquired the process to be used for vendor selection. The Police Chief responded the selection process should be clear; stated the process relates to how the information works with existing technology; the retention period should allow for information to be purged; vendor track records related to efficacy should be considered; expressed support for a vendor that is compatible with evidence.com; stated cost is an important factor; he would like a system which allows control over who has access to the information; expressed support for the information not being open for anyone to access; expressed support for a vendor that does not tie into a third party database; stated privacy is a concern and should be a priority. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the Police Chief envisions working with the City Manager to involve the City Council and the public in the Request for Proposal (RFP) processes to select a vendor. The Police Chief responded that he is open; stated that he take direction from the City Manager. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council February 1, 2022 11 | CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf |