pages: CityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2021-12-21 | 14 | The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated there appears to be no inconsistency; if Council wants a more in-depth, written analysis, the City Attorney's office is happy to provide. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated it sounds like the actions are consistent with the former Council's resolution. Councilmember Knox White stated Council gave direction to use the San Francisco data privacy policy until staff returns with an Alameda-specific policy; the policy requires the creation of a personal privacy impact evaluation report; he is confused as to why the report was not included with the staff report; questioned how staff found consistency with the Council policy direction. The Assistant City Attorney stated that he is not aware of Council's direction to perform a written analysis; he reviewed the resolution. Councilmember Knox White stated the policy report is not included with the staff report. Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern about the privacy analysis; stated a privacy policy was supposed to have the fix of an analysis being provided when matters come before Council; inquired whether the matter can return to Council in the future with an analysis, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council decides whether or not to move the matter to a future date; the matter was continued from a previous meeting; it is not clear that Council will implement anything at the current meeting; Council can provide direction for more information, including the privacy analysis. The Assistant City Attorney stated that he was not aware of the Council direction related to providing a written analysis; he will review the email and requirements; he will be happy to provide an expedited written analysis if desired by Council. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for calling public speakers. The City Attorney inquired whether the City Clerk could review the previous Council direction. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how much time would be needed for the information to be found; proposed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) matter [paragraph no 21-851 be taken in the meantime. The City Clerk responded that she can search while public comment is taken; noted the staff for the ARPA matter is different from the current agenda item. The City Attorney stated that in his brief review of the email there is real confusion between staff about whether or not a personal privacy policy was actually included in the Council direction; it will be helpful for the City Clerk to confirm the Council direction. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City Clerk would have enough time if Councils move ahead to the ARPA matter, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative. *** Regular Meeting Alameda City Council December 21, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-12-21.pdf |