pages: CityCouncil/2021-11-30.pdf, 21
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2021-11-30 | 21 | need on the site in the context of the overall Citywide Housing Element discussion and will come back with recommendations which could include changing the zoning to have no housing based on other housing decisions across the City. Councilmember Knox White made a substitute motion to approve providing direction to continue following the process outlined by staff with the understanding staff will return with zoning recommendations as a part of the Housing Element, including recommending whether or not housing should be an allowable use at the Harbor Bay Club. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Councilmember Knox White wanted to make the direction in connection with a motion to approve the General Plan [including related resolution], to which Councilmember Knox White responded in the negative. Councilmember Daysog stated that he seconded Councilmember Herrera Spencer's motion. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a substitute motion has been made; inquired whether the substitute motion vote would take precedent, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she does not believe her motion and Councilmember Daysog's second can be disregarded. The City Clerk stated a substitute motion is being made; Council needs to consider the substitute motion. On the call for the question the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council still needs to consider adoption of resolution adopting the Alameda General Plan 2040. Councilmember Knox White stated that he has a number of proposed corrections: "pre-history" should be changed to "early history" on page 10 under milestones; on page 11, Coastal Miwok is not correct; he expects better language to be used in place for the 2022 update; he would like to add language to prioritize early engagement of historically ignored voices on page 22 LU-1d.; there have been a number of processes which consider voices at the end versus at the beginning; the beginning is where the work is being done; expressed support for Council being affirmative in the General Plan policies related to outreach; requested Electronic Vehicle (EV) language move from transportation demand management on page 31 LU-16d to parking requirements on page 31 LU-16e; "such as a significant proportion dedicated spaces and infrastructure to support clean air vehicles like EV's, carpooling vehicles and hybrids as well" should move to 16.e; expressed support for the language reading: "commute support and unbundle parking;" stated page 39 LU-25 proposes a new action, which should include a process to ensure the City is aware and helps to pass on costs; page 57 under empower should include an action requiring the City to report out on how outreach has been conducted; he would like to add: "prioritize solutions and strategies which support both the City greenhouse gas reductions and meet other City policies for transportation, housing and economic development" Continued November 16, 2021 Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 30, 2021 21 | CityCouncil/2021-11-30.pdf |