pages: CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2021-06-15 | 6 | Stated that she is disappointed and confused by the budget proposal; the need for dramatic changes was made clear last year; changes are to ensure the safety and well- being for all; noted prior Council approvals; stated the budget does not convey a seriousness and is frustrating; expressed concern about only two options being proposed: the Felton Institute and Fire Department; stated that she does not think the City should go with the Felton Institute at this time due to Police involvement: Eve Gordon, Alameda. Stated there is a lot of momentum for change; the budget falls short; discussed her family member being the victim of a crime; stated that she did not feel comforted or supported by the response provided; there is deeper work to be done; urged Council look deeper at the work of the Subcommittees: Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda. Expressed support for including the DePave Park Master Plan in the budget; stated the Park is envisioned to be a wetlands education park for impacts of sea-level rise; the Park will be a jewel of the City; discussed redevelopment of the area surrounding DePave Park; stated there is a unique opportunity for the Park to receive funding from the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority; previous funding attempts have been denied since the City has not provided funding; urged Council to approve funding in order to demonstrate City support: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA). Expressed gratitude towards the City Manager's Office for information on the budget process; stated the budget remains largely the same as the prior year; there were not many changes to the budget; the budget is a two-year process; urged Council to make changes: Erin Fraser, Alameda. Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft requested the City Manager address questions and concerns raised by public comment. The City Manager stated about $1.3 million has been added to alternative policing, mental health, and the Police audit function; recommendations from the Subcommittees have been included in the budget; the money has not been specifically placed into programs, but is available for access moving forward; staff has budgeted for the Crime Analyst position and homeless programs; there will be access to American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, as well as contingency funds, that can be reallocated when needed; savings within the Police Department fund can be reallocated when necessary. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella stated it is important to clarify in plain terms for those not familiar with the budgeting process; if items are not included in the budget, Council can always amend expenditures; upcoming matters may include direction to use City funds from various funding streams; it is important to address questions directly; expressed support for participation from the public in the upcoming agenda matters; inquired whether funding for DePave Park will be part of the discussion. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 4 to the Community Improvement Commission June 15, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf |