pages: CityCouncil/2021-06-01.pdf, 10
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2021-06-01 | 10 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated members of the community have articulated goals very well; the approach from Greenway Golf is also considered and understood; the benefits include improving the appearance of the Golf Course, attracting more visitors, allowing more uses and increasing Golf Course revenue; some of the revenue generated goes to the City; the facility will be expanding to include a more robust youth golf program. Councilmember Knox White outlined reimbursement costs; inquired whether the reimbursement amount could be considered as pro-rated at the ten-year mark. The Recreation and Parks Director stated Greenway Golf is agreeable to a pro-rated reimbursement cost. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the pro-rated reimbursement is after the ten year period, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded the reimbursement cost will be pro-rated for the entire duration once improvements are completed. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the reimbursement cost cap is still $350,000, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative. The City Manager proposed the reimbursement cost language read: "all reasonable actual costs with a cap of $350,000" in the event that the costs are less than $350,000. The City Attorney inquired the denominator year where the reimbursement cost equals zero. Councilmember Knox White responded the remaining years in the contract from the point of completion in the project, without the extension; if the extension is reached, the likelihood of the space not used for another park or housing is high. The City Attorney stated the remaining years on the lease will be built into the agreement amendment to allow for no ambiguity; the agreement will now include $350,000 upon completion, amortized over the remaining number of years on the lease. The Recreation and Parks Director stated there are 32 years remaining on the base lease. Councilmember Knox White proposed using 30 years as the base denominator; stated the construction time will likely take a year and a half to two years for completion; it would not be fair to include the construction years. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of accepting the staff recommendation [including introduction of the ordinance] with striking Section 8 of the lease amendment. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which failed by the following roll call Regular Meeting Alameda City Council June 1, 2021 9 | CityCouncil/2021-06-01.pdf |