pages: CityCouncil/2020-10-20.pdf, 11
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2020-10-20 | 11 | (*20-668) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Purchase Light Emitting Diode Lamps and Fixtures from Wesco Distribution, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $243,833.92. Accepted. (*20-669) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Bayside Stripe & Seal, Inc. for the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Sign and Striping Maintenance Project, No. P.W. 02-20-13, in an Amount Not to Exceed Amount of $281,843. Accepted; and (*20-669A) Resolution No. 15717, "Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital Budget by Reducing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations in Capital Improvement Program 91811 by $328,524 and Increasing Revenue and Expenditure Appropriations for Capital Improvement Program 96011 by $328,524." Adopted. (20-670) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Contract Amendment with Ray's Electric for the Signal Installation at Harbor Bay Parkway/North and South Loop Road and Harbor Bay Parkway/Penumbra Place and South Loop Road, No. P.W.04-19-23, in an Amount Not to Exceed $280,890, for a Total Not to Exceed Expenditure of $873,690; and (20-670A) Resolution No. 15718, "Amending the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Capital Improvement Program Budget by Allocating $200,000 in Transportation Improvement Fee Funds to the Capital Improvement Program 96012 to Construct Signal Installation at Harbor Bay Parkway/North and South Loop Road and Harbor Bay Parkway/Penumbra Place and South Loop Road Project." Adopted. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the City spent $592,800 and realized an additional $280,890 was needed or has the City not yet spent the initial $592,800 and still realized the need for an additional $280,890; stated that he has a problem with the City initially spending $592,800 and realizing an additional $280,890 is needed; noted the project may need to be re-bid if the calculations were incorrect. The City Manager responded the additional $280,890 was needed due to unseen issues as the project was ending; stated the project has gone over-time and was initially approved in 2019. The City Engineer stated a short while after the project began, the contractor encountered issues with sand, which were incorrectly characterized at the initial evaluation; the City has spent a significantly higher amount of money on foundations; materials have already been ordered and the project is too far along to turn back; power source needs were not clearly communicated to Alameda Municipal Power (AMP), which requires significantly more trenching. Councilmember Daysog stated the staff report is unclear on the current spending of the project; noted the clarification provided allows more understanding; stated staff will need to internally discuss procedures to take in order to catch these issues sooner rather Regular Meeting Alameda City Council October 20, 2020 10 | CityCouncil/2020-10-20.pdf |