pages: CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf, 17
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 17 | The City Attorney stated the County does not have the authority to regulate within an incorporated City; ordinances adopted by the County do not apply within Alameda. Councilmember Vella inquired how information is being provided and whether it is being provided in multiple languages. The Community Development Director responded the tenant and small business page on the City's website has been updated with implementing regulations and all tenant protection ordinances; noted the information has not been provided in other languages to date; the paralegal in the City Attorney's office has been fielding questions about the rent freeze and moratorium; stated staff, the rent program and Centro Legal are providing information and regulations. Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether there is information about how many people are deferring rent and the impacts. The Community Development Director responded that she has met with the Bay East Realtors' Local Government Relations Committee and roughly 70 to 75% of tenants have been paying rent in-full; noted the rent relief program is launching this week and will also be promoted as a resource and asset; it appears more than the majority of tenants are paying rent; stated those with challenges are able to find assistance. In response to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry, the Community Development Director stated tenants are encouraged to enter into a payback arrangement with their landlord; however, it is not a requirement in order to receive benefits. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there is a breach of contract or lease, should an agreement be made and the repayment not occur. The Community Development Director responded the ordinance, as proposed, states tenants cannot be evicted for nonpayment of any deferred rent over the thirteen month period; stated tenants will need to be current on rent, but any deferred rent cannot yield eviction. Councilmember Oddie outlined a possible payment agreement; inquired whether failure to abide by the agreement will result in eviction; expressed concern about side agreements which cannot be complied with resulting in eviction where the agreement trumps the ordinance. The Community Development Director stated the ordinance does not require an agreement. The City Attorney stated the breach depends on nature and drafting of the agreement; the matter is highly unusual and difficult to predict what a court could ultimately conclude; staff believes the breach will likely result in a breach of contract; however, it is difficult to conclusively say without further detail; noted agreements will likely be private Regular Meeting Alameda City Council January 21, 2020 11 | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |