pages: CityCouncil/2019-09-17.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2019-09-17 | 6 | Councilmember Daysog stated that he is remaining consistent in his opposition to the item due to the changes adopted being incredibly burdensome to smaller mom and pop landlords, when an alternative exists. Councilmember Oddie moved final passage of the ordinance. Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. (*19-516) Ordinance No. 3251, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Article XVIII to Chapter VI Concerning Fair Housing and Tenant Protections by Prohibiting Unlawful Tenant Harassment, Disruption of Housing Services and Housing Discrimination including Source of Income." Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (19-517) Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal Filed by Brian Tremper of the May 28 and July 22, 2019 Planning Board Decisions for a 172-Room Hotel and Restaurant at 2900 Harbor Bay Parkway (PLN 18-0381); and (19-517A) Resolution No. 15588, "Denying the Appeal Filed by Brian Tremper of the May 28 and July 22, 2019 Planning Board Decisions for a 172-Room Hotel and Restaurant at 2900 Harbor Bay Parkway (PLN 18-0381) and Upholding Planning Board Resolution PB19-16." Adopted. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there are two decisions and one appeal, which had been amended via e-mail. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded the hearing is de novo; stated Council is able to consider and make changes without limitation to the issues raised by the appellant; the appellant submitted the appeal after the first [Planning Board] decision, and then decided to consolidate both appeals once the Planning Board made its final decision. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the appeal was made on the first Planning Board decision, to which the Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded the May 28th decision. Councilmember Oddie stated in order for consideration there should have been an appeal on the second decision as well. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated there is no difference; outlined overturning the Planning Board's decision and having the item return for Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 September 17, 2019 | CityCouncil/2019-09-17.pdf |