pages: CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf, 17
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 17 | The Assistant Community Development Director stated the UP goes with the land; the property owner needs to enforce the conditions on their tenant. Mayor Spencer inquired whether both the owner and the tenant received notices. The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the owner has complained that the County Assessor's mailing address is incorrect; the City has given notice to the property owner. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is confused; inquired why the Harbor Bay Hotel is being referenced when the matter was not approved. The Assistant Community Development Director responded Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft is correct; stated there is no evidence from the Harbor Bay Hotel. Mayor Spencer inquired whether staff presented an offsite overflow parking proposal to the Planning Board for the hotel on Harbor Bay, that. The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the requirement is the hotel owner must have a lease with a neighboring property to park vehicles. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the original UP had a three year expiration date, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. In response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, the Assistant City Attorney stated a UP could be called for review; if the UP is extended and not revoked with a new purchaser, revoking the UP in the near term would be more difficult; in response to Councilmember Oddie's previous question, if the UP is not terminated and the sale goes through, there is a case on point where a property owner made substantial improvements to the property and the City attempted to revoke the UP; the matter was challenged in court; the court set it aside; if the UP is not terminated and the sale goes ahead, the ability to revoke the UP would be more difficult. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there would not be an issue if there is an agreement between the City and the new purchaser to have certain conditions and an expiration date, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Assistant Community Development Director stated the Planning Board addressed whether the use is not the problem or if the conditions need to be revised; the Planning Board decided the use is the problem. *** (17-482) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining items. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 18, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |