pages: CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf, 18
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2016-09-20 | 18 | tonight. The City Attorney responded that Councilmember Daysog's concern could be discussed; changing the plans would mean a change to the Tentative Map; stated staff hears the recommendation but would prefer that Council approve the project as is. Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not want to change any substantive details; he believes a statement needs to be sent to the residents. Mayor Spencer stated the problem needs to be solved; not allowing permits creates a safety issue that needs to be resolved; inquired whether there are any situations where one property owner has built out to an adjoining water parcel. The Assistant City Attorney responded the lines in the map were drawn straight out; the line moved slightly to avoid hitting obstructions; one dock extends onto the open water parcel on City property, which will be treated with Code Enforcement. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the goal is to hand the parcels over to the current land owner and modify as practical. The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated there is no situation where an improvement owned by one property owner is on another property owner's parcel. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the six public view access point have permits. The Assistant City Attorney responded the City is not finished receiving the permit history. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the six parcels should be a part of the maps now; stated a speaker is concerned there will be an additional cost in the future. The Assistant City Attorney responded having the six parcels as a part of the map now would be more cost efficient; there is still question on the public access. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the six parcels could be designated for the City right now and changed in the future. The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. The City Attorney stated the parcel lines can be drawn, but the process to figure out what makes the most sense will take time; the City might have to change the final parcel lines depending on the final resolution. Mayor Spencer stated designating the 35 feet as a hard line has not been done; the lines have gone a little to the left or a little to the right; she would be prefer keeping the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 20, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf |