pages: CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf, 4
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2016-09-06 | 4 | 364 Councilmember Daysog inquired if there is a letter or official confirmation, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded there is email confirmation. In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the Assistant Community Development Director stated the Planning Board passed a resolution that the site is appropriate for assisted living and office use; the Council needs to decide whether or not to uphold the Planning Board's decision. Councilmember Oddie inquired how the decision differs from the November 9, 2015 decision. The Assistant Community Development Director responded the November 9, 2015 decision was not a decision on the property, rather it clarified the Zoning Code; the question is whether assisted living is permitted under the Zoning Code. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether or not the assisted living facility is in conformance with the commercial use zoning is not what has been appealed, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the Council can question the use on the particular site. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether a traffic and parking study was done for the site; and if numbers compare traffic under the assisted living use and the original 2006 office building. The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the use has 41 spaces during morning peak hours and afternoon versus 205 for the previously approved plan, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired what type of parking design is required for the facility. The Assistant Community Development Director responded the parking is lower density compared to the 2006 office plan; assisted living generates a lot less parking demand. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the project would provide 60 parking spaces; and whether the Code requires 43 spaces, so the plan is 17 spaces over the required amount, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired if the use is within the Airport Land Use Compatibility plan, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the Water Emergency Transportation Authority Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 6, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-09-06.pdf |