pages: CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf, 20
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2016-03-01 | 20 | (16-114) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider the remaining item: the referral on mixed use zoning. [paragraph no. 16-117 Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of considering the item. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes: Councilmember Oddie - 1. Submitted information; stated that he is concerned about the RRAC structure as proposed; a little bit of clarity could avoid conflict: John Sullivan, Alameda. Stated the plan has technical concerns that need to be addressed; Alameda is facing a housing crisis; urged Council to help alleviate housing stress for Alameda families: Phillip James, Alameda. Expressed concern over the operating cost of the ordinance; stated the fee study should estimate a lower amount and decrease the bureaucracy: Rosalinda Fortuna, Alameda. Stated the purpose of government is to provide justice; Council should listen to voters and take steps to ensure everyone stays honest: Malia Vella, Alameda. Councilmember Daysog stated that he appreciated Mr. Sullivan's handout; some of Mr. Sullivan's suggestions would work to stymie the increased rents; adopting some ideas would show that Council is trying to do the best for the small mom and pop landlords; having agencies like ECHO Housing evaluate renter's habitability claims is a good suggestion; he also likes the idea of the relocation assistance benefit being paid to the next landlord; he would like to exempt owners of up to two residential units in relocation assistance for family move-in. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is intrigued by Mr. Sullivan's suggestions, but would like to pass the ordinance in the form of the first reading; she would like to give the ordinance a chance; the current Council could make a change before the year is up; all tenants should be protected; different classes of tenants should not be created; fairness should also extend to all landlords. Councilmember Oddie stated there are some mom and pop landlords that are not behaving properly; he supports the ordinance as written; things could be improved; if data shows the ordinance needs to be tweaked, Council could have a discussion; there will not be hostility between landlords and tenants, it is up to each party; landlords who behave properly will not be subject to any of the provisions of the ordinance; encouraged all parties to have positive human relations; stated if everyone treats others fairly, additional regulations would not be needed. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 1, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf |