pages: CityCouncil/2015-12-15.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2015-12-15 | 9 | 543 input. The Planning Services Manager clarified many lots already have accessory buildings, which the ordinance is encouraging be used for second units. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Planning Services Manager stated the current requirement is that no more than 60% of the lot can be covered by the buildings or driveway. In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry, the City Planner stated the second unit requirements are greater than requirements for single family homes, which can be 100% paved over. The Planning Services Manager noted the City has lost 23 units from Victorians being converted back into single family homes; more people are asking to remove units than add units. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the proposed ordinance would be one more tool to address the rental housing shortage; both affordable and market rate units are needed; that she does not see a need to differentiate between a family member or renter living in the unit because both have value; there should be incentives to make units affordable, which is in the Santa Cruz ordinance; the floodgates will probably not open due to the cost to create a second unit; that she does not see a need to limit digging out ground floor units; expressed support for Mr. Owen's suggestion of 750 square feet or 10%, whichever is lesser; stated that she supports doing a pilot for one year and having a specific number of units trigger review; suggested Council provide direction on specific amendments; inquired whether making modifications would allow the ordinance to be introduced. The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated the ordinance could only be introduced if the modifications are minor. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter should not be delayed. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like greater incentives for affordable housing, such as Santa Cruz waiving fees and Piedmont waiving parking; a clearer connection needs to be made; senior housing, which is at risk, should be incentivized as well; requested additional information on houses being raised to build units below; discussed infill housing concerns from the 1990s regarding houses being raised and changing the character of the neighborhood; stated the matter should be sent back to the Planning Board or staff; expressed support for a pilot program. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she supports the staff recommendation to require two independent parking spaces. Mayor Spencer expressed support for Mr. Owen's suggestion regarding 750 square feet Regular Meeting Alameda City Council December 15, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-12-15.pdf |