pages: CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2015-09-01 | 15 | 372 On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie - 3. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1. [Absent: Vice Mayor Matarrese - 1.] Councilmember Oddie expressed that he would rather remand the matter back to the Planning Board, but would support the motion in order to have conditions added. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution documenting the Council action for 2350 Harbor Bay Parkway with the conditions or additional tasks that Council has given staff to address. The Interim City Manager stated the tasks should be included in the record. Councilmember Oddie clarified the additional tasks include that the parking is resolved either with a signed contingent lease or some other executable contract. The City Planner stated the condition is there be an executed lease prior to building permit. Councilmember Oddie stated the lease would be for 24 hour lease parking or an approved parking lot that has gone through the Design Review process. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft clarified that her motion does not include paving over something to just be a parking lot. Councilmember Oddie stated Council should be clear a parking lot is not desired. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated she means lease-shared parking. Councilmember Oddie stated if it does not get approved, there is no project. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft concurred; stated the ball is in the applicant's court. Councilmember Oddie clarified the lighting issue is also included in the motion. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the applicant could return to Council if the lease is not done, to which the City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the applicant could ask Council to reconsider the motion. The City Planner stated that he has been talking to the architect; the lighting has to be reviewed. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft clarified what Council wanted addressed is avoiding the impact on the neighbors. The City Planner stated there is no need to uplight the building. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 1, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-09-01.pdf |