pages: CityCouncil/2015-05-05.pdf, 16
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2015-05-05 | 16 | Sandip Jarwahal, Webster Street Business Association (WABA) President, stated BIA dues are calculated and paid on the business license tax; Target's revenue was estimated because it was their first year. Expressed concern about WABA activities and lack of effort to promote businesses; stated that he feels WABA is not being transparent on the use of BIA fees and does not contribute financially to events: Michael Cooper, Alameda. Addressed Mr. Cooper's concerns; stated WABA is transparent and all meetings are open to members; copies of financial reports are distributed at all meetings; WABA is a non-profit organization and does not contribute to event promoters: Sandip Jariwala, WABA. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Safeway and Target would exceed 50% of the assessment. The Economic Development Manager responded WABA's 2014 BIA was approximately $50,000; Safeway and Target would be approximately $12,000. Mayor Spencer inquired what the amount would be without the cap; to which the Economic Development Manager responded he does not have the information readily available. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated one effect of removing the cap would place Target and Safeway ahead of other business members and make it a less even playing field; the Webster Street BIA should get as much assessment as possible, but voting rights hinge on percent of assessment. Mayor Spencer inquired whether adding up the Webster Street businesses would make the 50% mark. The Economic Development Manager stated he would have to calculate the gross receipts for each of the new businesses at Alameda Landing; amounts are hard to estimate since the businesses are not at full buildout. Mr. Jarwahal stated BIAs for new businesses are estimated; if the cap is removed, Alameda Landing businesses would be contributing more to the BIA than the businesses on Webster Street; the cap makes it a level playing field. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a protest was received on the assessment. The Economic Development Manager responded in the negative; stated one phone call was received and tonight's speaker is only 2.8%. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 16 May 5, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-05-05.pdf |