pages: CityCouncil/2015-02-17.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2015-02-17 | 9 | Stated that she is hoping Site A can be enjoyed by her daughter's generation as well as seasoned residents: Vicki Sedlack, Alameda Stated Site A development is controlled by the City and responds to the community's wishes to benefit the entire Island; stated Site A is a great contribution to infrastructure and a solid start for the rest of development: Helen Sause, Alameda Home Team Stated that she is excited about the cultural landscape and having youth work at Alameda Point; housing is important for the future of Alameda Point; she supports the Site A plan: Laura Thomas, Renewed Hope Housing Advocates. Stated that he is happy the plan is evolving nicely and that the developer worked public comments in nicely; he likes the 75% rental housing plan and affordable housing: William Smith, Renewed Hope Housing Advocates Stated Site A supports System infrastructure and open space; affordable housing is a great way to support the community moving forward; that she supports the plans; urged Council to move forward: Anne DeBardeleben, Alameda. Stated that she appreciates the Site A public process, which inspired her to get involved; Site A will provide benefits of a unique culture and community for Alameda: Rachel Campos, Alameda. Stated APC's success is tied to the success of Site A; the selection of Eden Housing is tremendous and adds value to the neighborhood; that he is excited for opportunities to innovate: Doug Biggs, APC. Expressed supports for APP; stated building proper types of housing and amenities to support the residents and employees is important: Rich Krinks, Alameda. Urged Council to move the project forward; stated that she appreciates the community outreach by APP: Karen Bey, Alameda. Stated being able to live in Alameda Point in a transit-rich sustainable community is always what he has looked for; transit is key to congestion in all of Alameda: Jon Spangler, Alameda. Urged Council to focus on the waterfront aspect; stated the entire waterfront being part of Phase 1 is nice; making the waterfront plan vibrant will make the property more valuable and jumpstart Site B: Irene Dieter, Alameda Councilmember Matarrese stated a letter from the developers went to the Planning Board asking for exemption to Measure A with no density bonus; requested staff to explain the letter as it relates to the town center and precise plan. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 February 17, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-02-17.pdf |