pages: CityCouncil/2015-01-06.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2015-01-06 | 9 | supported by the community; urged moving forward: Nik DeHejia, Alameda. Expressed support for the process and the developer: Harry Hartman, Alameda. Stated the project will provide affordable housing; that he has waited 47 years for the Del Monte building to be renovated: Art Lenhardt, Alameda. Discussed integrity and fear of change; questioned why the decision is being revisited: Kari Thompson, Alameda resident and Chamber of Commerce Government Relations and Economic Development Committee. Expressed concern over blight and truck traffic: Robert Byrne, Alameda. Stated the City Council has every right to review the matter; urged the Council to do what is right; expressed concern over the low income housing requirements not being met; stated traffic impacts of all development projects need to be reviewed; urged repeal: Kurt Peterson, Alameda. Outlined the public process and project benefits; noted a letter was submitted outlining objections to repeal; discussed compliance with Master Plan and Density Bonus requirements: Mike O'Hara, Tim Lewis Communities. Outlined the key wins of the project; stated there are no documents explaining what is so egregious about the project to warrant appeal; urged the ordinances not be repealed: Alison Greene, PLAN! Alameda. Outlined the community involvement that formed the project: Heather Little, PLAN! Alameda. Expressed concern over the project being incomplete; urged the project be deferred until infrastructure matters have been addressed: Red Wetherill, Alameda. Expressed support for the developer; outlined his history with the Del Monte property; urged the ordinances not be rescinded; outlined project benefits: Peter Wang, Del Monte Warehouse Owner. Stated that she is opposed to repealing the Del Monte decision; outlined neighborhood involvement; stated it is time to move forward: Anne Bracci, Alameda. Stated the League of Women Voters is not taking a position on the project; the League stands for open government and transparency; the item is not in compliance with the Sunshine Ordinance; questioned the factual basis for the rescission; urged voting against repeal: Felice Zensius, League of Women Voters. Stated repeal would not stop the project; development was addressed during the election; stated additional work is needed: Ariane Paul, Alameda. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council January 6, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-01-06.pdf |