pages: CityCouncil/2014-12-02.pdf, 16
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2014-12-02 | 16 | Mr. Olmstead responded in the affirmative; stated the TDM can include very specific language; Alameda has general language which states the program will be monitored and adjusted as needed; the adjustments can include a range of activities including increasing the fee and changing the TMA composition; including very specific language in a TDM before a baseline is established is challenging; that he recommends general language that includes provisions in case goals are not met, but leaving language flexible to allow response to specific needs. Councilmember Daysog stated the TDM is the official document referenced in the DA; unless the language is changed now to incorporate the flexibility, Council cannot come back later and enforce changes. The City Attorney noted the DA does not reference a specific, dated TDM plan and does allow for flexibility in the TDM. Councilmember Daysog stated he would like to change language in the DA to state the developer implement a "Council approved TDM Program," instead of a "Planning Board approved TDM Program." Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what the mechanism is for allowing flexibility in the TDM. The City Planner responded the DA states the City will implement a TDM plan approved by the Planning Board; the TDM Plan, approved by the Planning Board on November 11, has flexibility; the plan requires annual monitoring and the ability to shift services. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there is language stating the City Council has powers to enforce calibrated penalties. The City Planner responded the surveys and annual monitoring gives the Planning Board and the Council the power and ability to find out if the TDM is not working; in consultation with the TMA, staff can put resources into the things that are working. Councilmember Chen stated people's lives change and it is unfair to penalize residents for changing their driving or work habits. Mayor Gilmore noted existing Alamedans may downsize to live at Del Monte. Expressed support for the project, which has the ability to become the anchor of the Northern waterfront; outlined project benefits; urged approval: Karen Bey, Alameda. Expressed concern over completion of the Clement Avenue extension and the height of the two new buildings: Debra Arbuckle, Alameda. Stated the design lacks vision; parking in the area is difficult now; stated funding is needed for Little John Park; urged additional time: Jay Ingram, Alameda. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 December 2, 2014 | CityCouncil/2014-12-02.pdf |