pages: CityCouncil/2014-07-29.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2014-07-29 | 2 | Ayes: Councilmembers Chen, Tam and Mayor Gilmore - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Daysog and Ezzy Ashcraft - 2. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*14-336 CC) Ordinance No. 3103, "Alameda Open Space Fiscal Responsibility Ordinance Pertaining to the Initiative Measure to Amend City of Alameda General Plan Including the 2007 2014 Housing Element and the Zoning Ordinance to Classify Approximately 3.899 Acres of Land Adjacent to McKay Avenue to Open Space.' Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (14-337 CC) Recommendation to Approve an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) between the City of Alameda and Alameda United Commercial LLC for the Bachelors Enlisted Quarters (BEQ). [Note: The ENA for the 5.5 acre site on the taxiway [paragraph no. 14-306 was discussed as part of this agenda item.] The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point gave a brief presentation. Mayor Gilmore requested staff to explain what would be done during the initial 30 day period to determine whether the developer is qualified. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded what staff would be looking for is included in the Statement of Qualification (SOQ) requirements; listed the requirements. Mayor Gilmore noted that she requested the explanation to inform the public. Councilmember Chen inquired whether developers going through the Request for Proposals (RFQ) process would face the same requirements, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative; stated the SOQ requirements would be the same. Councilmember Chen inquired whether 30 days would be enough time to submit qualification information. The Chief Operating Officer responded developers responding to the RFQ had six weeks; stated 30 days is less time, which is more restrictive; a competitive process has not been used; that she is comfortable with the amount of time; the developer has been aware of the requirements for some time and could have already started. The City Manager stated the situation is different because it is not the result of an RFQ process and needs to be handled more promptly in the event the property needs to be Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and City of Alameda Financing Authority July 29, 2014 | CityCouncil/2014-07-29.pdf |