pages: CityCouncil/2013-09-25.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2013-09-25 | 2 | housing option; stated infrastructure must be smart grid, plug and play; expressed concerns about cost estimates: Jon Spangler, Alameda. Expressed concerned about housing alternatives; stated retail should be spectacular and is the opportunity to make Alameda Point a destination: Karen Bey, Alameda. Expressed concern over the vagueness of the EIR; stated the Reuse Plan includes important specifics, which are not in the EIR; schools are particularly important and not well discussed; rigorous community oversight is lacking: Diane Lichtenstein, Alameda. Stated that she is impressed with the mix of open space and light industrial space; the light industrial zone should meet the water and include small and medium size businesses: Adrienne Lakadat, Alameda. Stated traffic in Chinatown in Oakland is a problem; urged the City to work with Oakland to resolve the issue: Alex Dannebaum, Alameda. Expressed concern about transportation issues; stated retail would be automobile based; expressed concern over public involvement: Former Councilmember Doug deHaan, Alameda. Expressed concern that sea level rise issues have not been adequately addressed: Bob Sikora, Alameda. Stated the Alameda Point Collaborative will have written comments; requested more information on mitigation, environmental and justice issues: Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative. Stated that he is interested in the historic structures, class issues, transportation and connection to BART: Craig Miott, Alameda. Expressed concern about building height in the Enterprise District; urged support for the current Alameda Point business community: Amanda Shepard, Alameda. Mayor Gilmore noted Chapter 4 of the EIR provides a history and is a really great way for anyone interested to get up to speed. Councilmember Daysog requested staff to double check EIR Appendix G which addresses transportation and circulation data; stated that he believes there is a problem, which he emailed to staff. The City Planner stated staff would check the details on Appendix G. Councilmember Tam stated the historical evolution of Alameda Point in Chapter 4 is worth noting because a frame of reference is needed; 14,000 jobs were lost; 9,000 jobs Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 2 Planning Board September 25, 2013 | CityCouncil/2013-09-25.pdf |