pages: CityCouncil/2012-10-16.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2012-10-16 | 3 | Councilmember Johnson seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Tam - 1.] (12-502) Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of Two Conditions Imposed on the Approval of a Design Review and Use Permit Application to Construct Two New Retail Buildings at 1600 Park Street; and (12-502A) Resolution No. 14744, "Upholding the Planning Board Resolution PB-12-13 Approving Design Review and Use Permit Applications (PLN11-0378) to Construct Two New Retail Buildings at 1600 Park Street." Adopted. The Acting City Planner gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether there would be any difference in the configuration of the parking lot if the agreement with Market Place does not go through. The Acting City Planner responded if the agreement between the two property owners goes though, there would be access between the two parking lots; one big parking lot would serve all three buildings. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether there are two entrances/exits from Foley Street, to which the Acting City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the new plan would add a third egress. Councilmember Johnson inquired how CVS trucks would get in and out of the parking lot for loading. The Acting City Planner responded the trucks would come in from Park Street and exit Tilden Way. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether the trucks would be able to exit on Tilden Way, to which the Acting City Planner responded in the affirmative; stated CVS wants the ability to load and unload trucks parked on Park Street before normal business hours, so as not to clog the customer parking lot. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the proposal would allow the activity in the parking lot daily, to which the Acting City Planner responded in the affirmative. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether consideration was given to unloading the trucks between 8 p.m. and 11p.m. The Acting City Planner responded in the negative; stated the scenario was not discussed; the assumption was the trucks come in the morning. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 October 16, 2012 | CityCouncil/2012-10-16.pdf |