pages: CityCouncil/2011-07-19.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2011-07-19 | 15 | The Acting Community Development Director stated the Settlement Agreement has provisions regarding assignment or transfer of the rights; the Settlement Agreement states that transferring or assigning rights has to be done with a person or entity who is qualified to build the reduced density alternative; similar provisions would be in the OPA. Councilmember Johnson stated that she would like to explore ways for putting in a phasing schedule; the City can say that the financial incentives are triggered by the approved map, not when the property is sold or major construction starts; staff should be given direction to ensure the street appears public, not like a private driveway, and to determine how to provide parking for the park; inquired whether a phasing schedule should be established for park improvements. The Acting City Attorney responded the conditions of approval have a requirement for a phasing schedule at a certain point of time. The Planning Services Manager stated the conditions of approval also establish specific phasing for the completion of open space and affordable housing. The Acting City Attorney stated the property owners are already aware that the City has the ability to do some self help in terms of the hazards on the site if postponement occurs. Councilmember Johnson moved adoption of the resolution with amendments to: 1) explore a phasing schedule, 2) provide financial incentives being triggered by approval of the [final] map, 3) ensure the street has the appearance of a public street, and 4) provide public parking for the park. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the existing facility would be deconstructed or demolished. The Planning Services Manager responded current conditions require photo documentation of the demolition-recycling requirement; there is no requirement for a particular deconstruction. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (11-403) Ordinance No. 3034, "Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Alameda, California, Determining It Will Comply with the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program Pursuant to Part 1.9 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code in Order to Permit the Continued Existence and Operation of the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda." Adopted. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 July 19, 2011 | CityCouncil/2011-07-19.pdf |