pages: CityCouncil/2011-04-05.pdf, 10
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2011-04-05 | 10 | The Public Works Director responded the number of permits is not established in the proposed ordinance; but would be addressed in the resolution establishing the zone; stated some cities allow up to three permits. Councilmember Johnson stated two-hour parking is the most difficult to enforce; tires need to be marked and rechecked to do an effective job. The Public Works Director stated the Police Department is aware of the proposed ordinance; the Police Department would need to hire new staff; the cost would be covered by the permit costs. The Acting City Manager stated some days people would get a free ride; the Public Works Department has worked with the Police Department to establish something that is doable. Councilmember Johnson stated enforcement in the downtown area should not be reduced; inquired how start up costs would be paid if permits are never issued, to which the Public Works Director responded in-lieu parking fees would be used. Mayor Gilmore inquired how the PPP would work if Jackson Park residents could not get the 55% minimum but could get 35% to 40% and be willing to pay $55. The Public Works Director responded residents should cover upfront costs in case the district is not established. Mayor Johnson inquired what the upfront costs would be, to which the Public Works Director responded $4,500 [excluding purchasing a vehicle]. Councilmember Tam inquired whether the Jackson Park area would have the required 600 dwelling units, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Johnson suggested installing parking meter boxes at the Jackson Park area and selling parking permits to residents; stated revenue would be generated every day. The Public Works Director stated a residential permit-parking ordinance would still be needed; that he is not sure whether the spillover problem would be eliminated. Councilmember Tam stated 40% of 600 dwelling units divided by $4,500 would be $18.75 per resident. Mayor Gilmore stated [an $18.75] credit could be given for the first year permit fee; noted that parking meter boxes are expensive; stated residents would not be motivated [to initiate a petition] if parking is not considered a problem. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 April 5, 2011 | CityCouncil/2011-04-05.pdf |